<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Well &#8216;ard logos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davymac.com/wordpress/2006/09/26/well-ard-logos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davymac.com/wordpress/2006/09/26/well-ard-logos/</link>
	<description>Blogging on creativity, business and freelancing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 07:46:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John of Dublin`</title>
		<link>http://www.davymac.com/wordpress/2006/09/26/well-ard-logos/comment-page-1/#comment-1302</link>
		<dc:creator>John of Dublin`</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 12:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davymac.com/wordpress/?p=115#comment-1302</guid>
		<description>Hi Davy,

You make great points there. Siemens, Sony and many others come to mind. Many forget that the name of your company should stand out as goddamn obvious!

I designed our own logo myself 7 years ago. I just wonder what you think of it. www.multinet.ie It is hard faced geometry I suppose but does contain a small radial colour gradient in a centre circle. I does look fine in B&amp;W and comes out good on faxes.

Cheers

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Davy,</p>
<p>You make great points there. Siemens, Sony and many others come to mind. Many forget that the name of your company should stand out as goddamn obvious!</p>
<p>I designed our own logo myself 7 years ago. I just wonder what you think of it. <a href="http://www.multinet.ie" rel="nofollow">http://www.multinet.ie</a> It is hard faced geometry I suppose but does contain a small radial colour gradient in a centre circle. I does look fine in B&amp;W and comes out good on faxes.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davy</title>
		<link>http://www.davymac.com/wordpress/2006/09/26/well-ard-logos/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>davy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 09:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davymac.com/wordpress/?p=115#comment-75</guid>
		<description>Good point Joshua,
Heh, I usually find that the technical reasons for not being able to print a &#039;new web&#039; style logo are often lost on most clients, however they always understand when I tell them it may triple the printing costs to attempt matching it on paper.

Mind you, if they ever have to print a nice colour brochure they could find they have to revert to the awful &#039;logo in a white box&#039; syndrome

Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Joshua,<br />
Heh, I usually find that the technical reasons for not being able to print a &#8216;new web&#8217; style logo are often lost on most clients, however they always understand when I tell them it may triple the printing costs to attempt matching it on paper.</p>
<p>Mind you, if they ever have to print a nice colour brochure they could find they have to revert to the awful &#8216;logo in a white box&#8217; syndrome</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Jeffryes</title>
		<link>http://www.davymac.com/wordpress/2006/09/26/well-ard-logos/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Jeffryes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 05:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davymac.com/wordpress/?p=115#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Well said.

I think web companies (the ones behind the reflections and similar fads) are an interesting case. For some of them, their logos will almost never be presented on anything but a monitor. That makes unprintable colors and effects okay for them, the issue is when more mainstream businesses want to pick up on the fad. How do you tell a client their logo can&#039;t look shiny?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said.</p>
<p>I think web companies (the ones behind the reflections and similar fads) are an interesting case. For some of them, their logos will almost never be presented on anything but a monitor. That makes unprintable colors and effects okay for them, the issue is when more mainstream businesses want to pick up on the fad. How do you tell a client their logo can&#8217;t look shiny?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davy</title>
		<link>http://www.davymac.com/wordpress/2006/09/26/well-ard-logos/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>davy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davymac.com/wordpress/?p=115#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Sound thinking Mike, as mentioned in the post there are certainly situations where effects are useful (mostly web work I find) but, as in the building trade, good foundations are essential.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sound thinking Mike, as mentioned in the post there are certainly situations where effects are useful (mostly web work I find) but, as in the building trade, good foundations are essential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rohdesign</title>
		<link>http://www.davymac.com/wordpress/2006/09/26/well-ard-logos/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>rohdesign</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davymac.com/wordpress/?p=115#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Agreed Davy. I always provide designs that work as black and white and if the client really wants some special effects, those get applied to the old-school type mark. This way the underlying logo is always sound, and any special effects that may go stale after a while can be easily removed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed Davy. I always provide designs that work as black and white and if the client really wants some special effects, those get applied to the old-school type mark. This way the underlying logo is always sound, and any special effects that may go stale after a while can be easily removed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.davymac.com/wordpress/2006/09/26/well-ard-logos/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davymac.com/wordpress/?p=115#comment-19</guid>
		<description>I could not agree more.  It is so difficult to correctly colour match print and web when more than 50% of the logo is gradient and drop shadow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could not agree more.  It is so difficult to correctly colour match print and web when more than 50% of the logo is gradient and drop shadow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claire</title>
		<link>http://www.davymac.com/wordpress/2006/09/26/well-ard-logos/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Claire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davymac.com/wordpress/?p=115#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Yes, that&#039;s a good benchmark of a good design. I&#039;m a huge fan of logo art, I think it&#039;s underestimated because good ones are so deceptively simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that&#8217;s a good benchmark of a good design. I&#8217;m a huge fan of logo art, I think it&#8217;s underestimated because good ones are so deceptively simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danger</title>
		<link>http://www.davymac.com/wordpress/2006/09/26/well-ard-logos/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>danger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davymac.com/wordpress/?p=115#comment-17</guid>
		<description>couldn&#039;t agree more. Gotta love a strong logo that looks just as good one colour or multi colour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>couldn&#8217;t agree more. Gotta love a strong logo that looks just as good one colour or multi colour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
